Hikari Nanase's Essay on Snape
Written by Hikari_Nanase
Sep 21, 03 - 9:23 PM
Original posted at : Severus Snape Slytherin Society
Whilst studying for my dreaded human bio midterm, I suddenly realized it hath been three hours since my last break and decided to indulge in a bit of Snape. The result is this lovely article: Case in Point: Severus Snape By now,
any number of people discussing the Potions master have cited Snape's
introductory speech about there being no foolish wand-waving or silly
incantations in HIS class. And while I believe Rowling may have shown us Molly
stirring her cookpots with her wand at one point, we never see Snape or anyone
else using their wand to stir a cauldron while producing a Potion. Yet,
clearly magic must be used in Potions-making or even Muggles could do it. And
that is highly unlikely. I suspect that if you gave a Muggle a set of
ingredients and a cauldron and told him to set to it, all he would end up with
is a very lumpy, probably toxic mess. I tend to
regard Snape's opening speech to the first-years in the nature of throwing out
a challenge that although they will hardly believe that this is magic since
there is no "foolish wand-waving" involved, it is magic for all of
that, and magic that they probably haven't the wit to master. I have no doubt
whatsoever that Potions brewing requires the very active use of magic in order
to work at all. Magic,
and ritual. The whole construction and assembly of a Potion is as close to
formal, ceremonial "magick" as what Rowling chooses to show us of the
subject ever gets. (In fact, it is interesting to note that the only glimpse of
out-and-out magical "ritual" we HAVE seen so far was structured
around the assembly and use of a Potion.) Potion
brewing seems inherently to be an extremely formal, highly structured branch of
magic - on a purely physical level. This kind of formal, ritualistic
structuring seems to seep over into other parts of Snape's demeanor as well. It
certainly is a large part of what makes his mannerisms so different from
everyone else's. It also probably colors his perceptions of the world around
him. Having to watch an ever-changing parade of adolescents slogging away over
their cauldrons in a thoroughly slovenly manner with not a clue about proper
deportment or respect for the process probably infuriates him. (Any takers on
the likelihood that it is Dumbledore's irreverence over ceremony which so
baffles and frustrates Snape?) In
addition to that, the kind of accidents that happen in Potions class, and the
potential frequency of those accidents would tend to support the reading that a
Potions class is a situation where you've got a roomfull of young wizards with
still developing powers trying to focus and direct magical energies wandlessly.
Which is bloody dangerous! You definitely want someone with good reflexes and a
cool head in charge. The good Professor's customary watchfulness is a job
requirement. As to the
"good Professor's" character; it's reasonably evident that within the
parameters of my interpretation of Dark vs. Light magic, Severus Snape has
probably had a number of possible opportunities in which he might have
sustained some degree of psychic damage from the unrestrained use of the Dark
Arts. He remains at further risk (however slight) as a professional Potions
brewer due to the continuing need to focus magic wandlessly. But what the
actual level of such (possible) damage might be remains uncertain since it
probably overlays what, from our glimpse into the Pensieve, seems likely to
have been a rather poorly-socialized base, to begin with. It is
possible, for example, to postulate an intelligent and under-supervised child
with access to an extensive library doing some early damage to himself unwarily.
Although our hints regarding the Snape family background so far suggest it
would not be wise to run away with this idea. It is
also easy to hypothesize a Snape family history of perfectly legitimate
involvement in Dark Arts research of long enough standing to allow for at least
a few recorded occurrences of DA-related dementia to their "credit". It
is possible that at least one of such cases was recent enough for Severus to
have observed it at first hand (a grandparent, a great-uncle or aunt,
permanently confined to St. Mungo's for the safety of the rest of the family,
perhaps?) We must not run away with this possibility, either, particularly
given that it depends entirely upon my own interpretations of the nature and
workings of Dark and Light magic, which have not been confirmed in canon. As to any
canon hints regarding Snape's family; The wizarding world is a very small
society. In such societies, particularly in the kind of subset of such a
society which is obsessed with their bloodlines, everybody tends to be related
to just about everybody else. Snape, if he is a pureblood from the same general
social group as Malfoy, would probably be some degree of cousin either to
Lucius or Narcissa, and quite possibly both of them. However, the glimpses we
got in Phoenix, and what we have seen of Snape's conduct do not support this
reading of his social status within the wizarding world. We get a
number of suggestions in canon that Severus may be from a quite different
background from the Malfoys. All the way back in PS/SS, at the end of the
Gryffindor/Hufflepuff match - which Harry brought to an end in about five
minutes - once Snape, who had volunteered to referee the match, landed his
broom, we saw him spit bitterly (and publicly) upon the ground. Somehow, I
cannot square that little demonstration with a wizard who was brought up
according to the sort of standards to which the Malfoy sprat is being held. Not
unless he hasn't yet outgrown a severe case of adolescent rebellion and is
still acting out from that sort of "I'm rough, tough and baaaaad" pose.
Which does not really fit anything else we have seen of him. From
those clues that we do get in canon, it is very difficult to make the total add
up to the predominant "fanon" interpretation of Aristocratic!Snape. The
man spits in public. This is not "couth". And, sharp as he does
certainly seem to be, he isn't what you could really call an "intellectual".
He is unmistakably "street smart" but outside of his own field (where
he is definitely, but definitely, on top of things) he doesn't really seem to
have that outstandingly high an accuracy rating. (Kappas are not either "more
usually found in Mongolia".) And his manner of "scoring off" of
people is not at all in the same sort of drawlingly "superior" style
of a Draco Malfoy, but is more pointedly snide and spiteful. For the most part,
he behaves like a churl. This really does not add up to his being Lucius
Malfoy's second cousin on his mother's side. What this
behavior sounds most like to me (and at this point this is still just a theory)
is something much closer to the (Crabbe & Goyle?) hereditary "retainer"
class of (apparent) pureblood than to that of the Lords of the Manor. Minions
do also come in the scrawny, shifty, clever - and vicious - mode as well as in
that of the more obvious muscle-bound thug. Snape's thin, sallow, greasy
description is very much in the style of the visual tags that are not
infrequently applied to this secondary class of "henchman". The "tough,
wily street kid" is the usual form that this one takes in other genres,
such as gangster stories. Or the thin, oily, sharply dressed, and shifty - or
dead-eyed fellow with the shiv, who waits in the dark of the alley. (Yes, that
kind of "family man".) I have
come progressively more around to the viewpoint that Snape's family background
is indeed that of a traditional family of "retainers" (the clever
sort who served as stewards and managers, or as specialists in a given field) to
one of the ancient wizarding "great houses". Most of such retainers'
families would have left their positions of direct service on the Great House's
family estates at the start of the Seclusion, with the removal of the wizarding
landholders from their country estates in favor of a townhouse in a secluded
wizarding district, but most of these former retainers remained in association
with their former "patrons" through ancient ties of mutual obligation.
I would imagine that the Snapes, at the highest estimate would be among the wizarding
"middle class", chiefly associated with white-collar jobs (in or out
of the Ministry) and the traditional "professions". Generally
respectable, but without an "income" that exempts their offspring
from having to support themselves. And from the greying underwear clue, it is
not unlikely that the Snapes' socioeconomic level was no higher than the "petit
bourgeoise". It also
quite easy to speculate that Severus is not the first Potions expert in his
family. In fact, he may very well come from a long line of professional
Herbalists and Apothecaries. If this is the case there could very well be a
long line of shopkeepers in his background, as well. But I doubt that his is a
family background consistent with that of the true Artisan class where everyone
in the family pitches in and manufactures artefacts for sale. I could
very easily see a 6-8 year-old Severus growing up above the family Apothecary
shop on the corner of Diagon and Knockturn Alleys, (or their equivalents in
some other urban wizarding district. I very much doubt that he is country bred)
helping his parents to put together their regular monthly order from their
hereditary "patron's" Head of Family, and feeling terribly grown-up
to be trusted to take an active part in "the family business". I can
also readily see a slightly older Severus making deliveries or running errands
for his parents throughout both Alleys and learning to be watchfully wary and
untrusting of the sort of strangers (personable or otherwise) who might
deliberately approach a child in either venue. If this sort of backstory is
anywhere on target, his having become the Potions master for one of the largest
Magical schools in Europe qualifies as a considerable success story. There is
at least a bit to suggest that Snape's personal standing is very much in the
middle, economically. Potion brewing is not likely to be a inexpensive
discipline with its need for a broad range of physical equipment and a steady
demand for consumable supplies, and I am sure that he maintains his own personal
tools and supplies as well as those provided by the school. He also appears to
direct more than a passing interest in the cut and presumably the quality of
his clothing and personal effects. (Reminding me forcibly of "My Father
the Clotheshorse".) Snape's robes may or may not come off the rack, rather
than being custom tailored, but we have yet to be told anything of these
matters, and I doubt that we ever will be. Without knowing how well the
teachers at Hogwarts are paid we cannot really postulate whether Snape is
living up to the last knut of his salary, doing just fine and putting something
aside for his old age, or supplementing his salary with private income Another
major issue which is still somewhat uncertain in canon is just to what extent Professor
Snape may share the typical Death Eater attitude toward wizards and witches
from Muggle families or those of mixed blood. The fact that the term "mudblood"
was never heard to pass his lips until OotP (and then only under what must be
admitted to have been considerable duress) has made this issue a particularly
difficult one to draw any firm conclusion on. And raises yet another
interesting possibility as to his background. The fact
that Snape joined the Death Eaters in the first place makes it fairly clear
that he at least did not find their stated agenda repellent in itself. And,
yes, I do assume that Snape's early upbringing probably did have all of the
underpinnings of conventional pureblood bigotry. For one thing, he was almost
certainly raised in an atmosphere where it was considered acceptable to look
down upon wizards and witches whose families were Muggles, or those who were
raised outside the wizarding world and, consequently, had no sense of the
'right' way to do things. However,
apart from the one incident which we saw, when he was 15-16 (and, for what it's
worth, I'm just a little inclined to wonder whether his lashing out at Lily
Evans for trying to "rescue" him might not be an inherent component
of just what made that particular memory so awful to him. A painful memory is
just as likely to be over something 'unworthy' that you did as it is to be
something that was done to you), virtually every example that we have seen of
Snape's other attempts to "pull rank" have been based upon some factor
other than the purity of his bloodline. It is always either his age, or his
position, or his understanding, or his experience. We have never seen him try
to play the "family" card. We have never seen him openly waving the
pureblood flag in anybody's face. The fact that he may indeed be pureblood (a
possibility still more implied than openly stated. Slytherin House has accepted
at least one notable halfblood to our certain knowledge) seems not to be an
issue that he regards as holding sufficient weight for him to attempt to deploy
it in maintaining a position of dominance, even in direct conflicts with known
Muggle-born or cross-breed members of the other Houses. Which, in
retrospect, and, given the widespread acceptance of such attitudes, begins to
look rather odd. It is
possible that his restraint is merely in accordance to school policy as regards
the conduct of the staff. But it is also entirely possible that Snape has some
other reason for not attempting to invoke this particular advantage. That this
particular consideration is of such absolute and all-absorbing importance among
the ranks of the pureblood supremacists suggests that it is possible that Snape
does not raise this point because he cannot raise this point. That, by the
criterion of the likes of Malfoy and company, he does not actually qualify as a
"true" pureblood, even if the unfortunate mudblood ancestor is many
generations back in history. If Snape
is indeed descended from a family of traditional retainers then according to
the kind of standards of lineage as those upheld by the Black family, he would
by definition have owed his descent from a "mudblood" who was "discovered"
by some wizarding aristocrat and educated at his expense. It is
also not impossible that Snape's more recent forebearers were not as exacting
in the matter of their bloodlines as their descendents have since become. There
could be a bonafide wizard/Muggle or Muggle-born marriage lurking somewhere in
the Snape woodshed. I would estimate at least 3 and more probably something
like 4-5 generations back. Or even dating to the pre-Seclusion period. Far
enough for it not to really matter anywhere except in Slytherin House. If this
is the case (and at this point in the series this is pure speculation), then
Snape would probably have set off to Hogwarts confident in the awareness of
being "practically" a pureblood, and would, upon being sorted into
Slytherin, have gotten a very rude shock. He would also have been made very
aware that he was only being "graciously" allowed to participate in
the activities of his better-connected fellows for the sake of his usefullness.
His relationship with Lucius Malfoy, such as we have seen it presented to date,
does not exclude the possibility of it having grown out of some act of patronage
on Malfoy's part. And for that matter, Snape's overall *********** of
temperament might well be grounded upon a perception that, do what he may, to
the people whose opinions matter, he will never be "quite" good
enough to be accounted an equal. Although,
in the event, his blood was certainly pure enough to be acceptable to Voldemort.
But then, Voldemort's followers do not generally know that their leader is the
son of a witch and a Muggle. As to
that; there probably were a good many different individual reasons why people
joined up in support of Voldemort. And I suspect that one of Snape's biggest
ones had to do with Malfoy's influence. We have finally learned in Order of the
Phoenix that Lucius Malfoy is about 5 years older than Snape (and the Marauders)
and their years at Hogwarts would have only briefly overlapped. Just long
enough for Lucius to have noted young Severus as "that scrawny little kid
who knows all those hexes" and for Severus to have learned that the
Malfoys were "important people that you want to know." We have
also been told more than once that young Snape was openly fascinated by the
Dark Arts, and there is no question that the opportunity to study and practice
them (which he could not have done at Hogwarts) would have been a powerful
lure, regardless of whatever other agenda was being trumpeted along with it. Snape, I think
was a late bloomer (or even a non-bloomer) in any social or emotional context. In
his fascination with the Dark Arts, I suspect that he never thought to question
the soundness of the values held by the sort of people who practiced them. I
tend to think we've got a clear example here where the preoccupations of
Slytherin House did him a great disservice. (As I
have stated in the essay regarding the Hogwarts Houses, Rowling is in her most
spectacularly self-contradictory mode where she lays out the values of
Slytherin House. It is presumably the house of the pureblood. Well, okay. That
is simple enough to accept. It is also the Dark Arts house. Well, that's okay
too. No particular contradiction there. But then she tells us that the
criterion the Hat uses for sorting these kids is ambition. WTF?! What has
ambition to do with being a pureblood? What possible effect can any amount of
ambition have on becoming a pureblood? Any effect that being a pureblood might
have upon ambition would more likely be to lessen it, if anything. You've
already "arrived," what more is necessary? Ambition seems to be
diametrically opposed to the kind of "Slytherin manner" demonstrated
by Malfoy and his goons. I just don't get it.) However,
given that Slytherin House seems to be the only one that tends to support the
Dark Arts, and that within that House it's the purebloods who are usually the
social leaders, such considerations would tend to muddy the waters in the
perception of a very poorly-socialized adolescent such as the young Severus
Snape. If all the Dark wizards he has ever met think like this then it might be
quite a while before he realized that adopting this particular mental outlook
wholesale is, first; not necessary, and second; not really him. I think
that Snape did definitely want to belong somewhere (although not to the point
of getting himself sorted into Hufflepuff). The capsule glimpses we have of his
childhood looked pretty alienating, and few youngsters manage to flourish in
that sort of an environment. But he seems to have been not at all selective
about what he wanted to belong to. Serious self-esteem issues there, perhaps?
Were the Death Eaters the only people who welcomed him? Clearly, however bright
he may be, he demonstrated seriously bad judgement as a youth. He may have been
very late to finally start thinking for himself. And, I
also suspect that it was Sirius Black who first pointed Snape out to James
Potter as a Dark Arts fanatic. Sirius was brought up in exactly that kind of
Slytherin House, Dark Arts tolerant atmosphere himself and he would have
immediately recognized in Snape the sort of boy of whom his own family would
have probably approved. And, consequently, made a point of doing Snape a bad
turn as soon as an opportunity arose. James, by all accounts, was brought up to
honestly loathe the Dark Arts. And to provide James Potter with a convenient "outside"
target would have deflected any Dark Arts related criticism and contempt from
Sirius himself. Another
interpretation which seems to be at least somewhat contradicted by information
that we have already been told in canon, is the widely accepted fanon concept
of Friendless!Snape. This
interpretation appears to be supported by our trip into the Pensieve in OotP,
where Snape's general unpopularity and solitary behavior would tend to confirm
it. But in GoF, Sirius Black directly tells us all that Snape was not
completely friendless for the entire time that he was at Hogwarts. We were told
that he was a part of a whole little gang of Slytherins. Nevertheless, we do
not see him and his friends evaluating their performance in the DADA OWL over
the lunch break, just Snape sitting alone in the shade rereading his test
papers. (And from the Pensieve visit, one is forced to wonder whether he may
have taken up with that little gang only after the incident that which we
witnessed. Or if, contrary to what appears to be typical Hogwarts behavior,
Snape's friends were in a different year group.) Stop and
think about that, and what it implies. Remus
Lupin might be able to sympathize. Here is another man who was a member of a
little self-contained group when he was at school. In fact, it was a larger
group than that of the Marauders. Sirius mentioned six Slytherins by name as
composing Snape's "gang". Two of those (Rosier and Wilkes) were
killed by Aurors by the time they were 21. Two more (the Lestranges) were in
Azkaban before they were 25 and of the six only Snape and Avery are still alive
and walking free. Avery got off on the Imperius defense, after Voldemort's
defeat and his social level may not have been high enough for people to
overlook that the way they have for Malfoy. In any case, we never saw him until
the graveyard meeting at the end of GoF. He does not seem to show any eagerness
to retain contact with the school, or with Snape. Snape was
never publicly accused (probably due to having cut a deal with Dumbledore when
he turned spy) prior to Voldemort's defeat. Sirius was inside from the day
after that event, and in no position to know what went on after that, but if
Sirius claims that he never heard any accusations* - and he claims he didn't - that
implies that none of the other prisoners mentioned Snape either, for all that
they had spoken bitterly of "Wormtail". Perhaps all that Snape's
exile at Hogwarts has cost him is further contact with Avery, and we don't
really know anything much from canon about Avery's character (other than that
he seems to be rather high-strung). (*Sirius
also claims that he didn't know that Snape was teaching at Hogwarts. This
despite the fact that we were told in OotP that Snape had started teaching a
couple of months before Voldemort fell, or Sirius's arrest. Either Sirius had
not been so deeply inside the Order as we have been led to believe, or he had
taken no interest in the doings of Hogwarts, or his memory was faulty.) As to
Snape's exile at Hogwarts; from Draco's comments in CoS Snape seems to have
still been in good favor with Lucius at least to that point in the series. And
appears to continue to be so during the course of Phoenix. I suspect that he
has been feeding information regarding the school to Lucius (who was on the
Board, after all) ever since he went to work there. Lucius may even have had
something to say about getting him his job in the first place, although whether
this appointment was orchestrated from behind the scenes by Dumbledore or
Voldemort is uncertain. It certainly had Voldemort's approval. As to the
Dark Arts and the original lure of the Voldemort cause; To a young Snape, as I
tend to read him, the whole issue would probably, at first, have looked very
simple. Particularly if I am correct in my speculation that the Dark Arts were
only finally removed from the Hogwarts curriculum upon Dumbledore's having
become Headmaster. Snape would have considered the study of the Dark Arts to be
his destiny, and have arrived to find that the class was no longer taught. He
also no doubt dreamed of power and glory, and he would readily have signed on
to the movement which assured him of the opportunities to achieve all of these.
Particularly if he was to do so under the sponsorship of someone as prominent
as Lucius Malfoy, and even more particularly if there had been nothing in his
own upbringing which would have conditioned him to regard the stated sentiments
of Voldemort's agenda as abhorrent in themselves. But,
if any of the above is the case, while the arrogance of youth and its
accompanying conviction of personal immunity might very well have shielded a
young Snape during the early days, when he considered Dark Arts study to be a
part of his "birthright" that those wusses in the Ministry were
trying to deny him, he might after a period of unrestrained Dark Arts activity
under Voldemort's sponsorship, have very well found himself undergoing some "dark
night of the soul" as a result of those activities which might have set
any available family skeletons dancing, and may have served as the necessary
wake-up call prompting him to rethink whether signing up with the DEs was
really all that good an idea. If,
despite what appears to be at least an average to high inherent capacity to
conduct magical energy, within a fairly short period of imprudent indulgence he
managed to "hit the wall" and realize that at this rate, rather than
power and glory, the end of all his dreams was far more likely to spiral down
into his being just another Snape in St. Mungo's, a personal epiphany of this
nature might also very well have fully opened his eyes to any subtle symptoms
of DA-related dementia which his Master was not quite managing to conceal. It
might even have been considerations along this line which prompted him to seek
out and offer his support to Dumbledore. We do not
know whether the current state of medi-magic can correct or repair the kind of
psychic damage that indulgence in the Dark Arts produces. Such a process may be
available. But, first, one must admit that one needs such treatment, and, under
the regulations of the Ministry concerning the Dark Arts, one probably must
explain how one originally came by such damage. This might deter more people
from seeking treatment than it ultimately assists. I also
think that Snape proved to be invaluable in the post-Voldemort mop-up of the
DE's activities. For example, I think that Snape was almost certainly the
person who provided the information which resulted in the capture of the
Lestranges (former close friends and schoolmates), and Barty Crouch. I suspect
that this, as well as the knowledge that Crouch is supposed to be dead,
accounts for Snape's shock as well as his immediate recognition when Crouch's
polyjuice wore off. I also suspect that the Crouches may have been another old
Slytherin family and, given their respective ages, Snape's student years at
Hogwarts are certain to have overlapped Crouch Jr.'s, even as they overlapped
Malfoy's. (Side
note: I am inclined to believe that a good deal of the reason that Crouch and
Pettigrew were able to subdue Moody so readily was the shock effect of Moody's
finding himself under attack by two "dead" men. Ghosts may attack,
but they cannot perform spells, so far as we know.) (For the
record, I also tend to think the reason that Dumbledore knew to send Hagrid to
Godric's Hollow so quickly was that either Snape told him the attack would be
that particular night, or that Dumbledore simply had the house bugged at all
entrances to alert him to any arrivals.) By the
time the Lestranges were arrested, there was no longer (if there ever had been)
any Ministry policy of leaving the small fry observed but not interfered with
in hopes of catching the big fish. By then the emphasis was to get the as much
of the inner circle out of commission as possible and leave any remaining small
fry without a potential hub around which to regroup. This campaign was not
helped by the apparent fact that the Dark Marks all disappeared when the Dark
Lord did, leaving investigating Aurors without any definite indication of
suspects' allegiances. Of course this also presupposes that the Aurors of the
day were aware that the Dark Lord had set a physical mark on all of his
followers, and this interpretation is not fully supported in canon. The
disappearance of the Dark Marks would have made a mess of the DE's
communication lines as well, and it is possible that even sending up the image
of the Dark Mark was now no longer possible (giving additional reason for the panic
on all sides at the World Cup when Crouch Jr. managed to do exactly that. The
Marks all began to return once Voldemort was again, however vestigially, on the
physical plane. But they may not have been apparent even to their bearers for
some time). digression
regarding the Dark Mark; Snape
states that the Dark Mark was used by the DEs to identify each other. So it is
likely that causing it to be revealed was something which the DEs had some
voluntary control over. I suspect that it may have been possible to conceal the
mark by magic, which its wearers could normally cancel and restore at will. When
they were called by their master this concealment was overridden, and it may
have either needed some sort of "cooling off" period before it could
be concealed again or Snape simply didn't bother, on the night of Voldemort's
rebirth, since he hadn't originally been intending to roll up his sleeves for
anyone that evening. If this
is the case, by the time most DEs were no longer in control of the concealment
of their Mark they would typically have already been dead or insane, or in the
hands of the Dementors, who, Crouch Jr informed us are blind. In the
case of death, Voldemort would be aware of it and have no reason to "call"
a corpse. Those who were dead in his service may have had nothing visible any
longer to mark them. In the
case of the captured, Voldemort would have fairly quickly been made aware of
this as well and taken care not to activate their Marks. It is likely is that
no one ever examined those in Azkaban for Marks which might have appeared since
their imprisonment. In the
case of the insane, this might also been a situation where Voldemort was either
already aware, or was soon informed and took care not to contact these
particular followers. What is
also likely is that - good as the system was - there would probably have been a
few slip-ups, of which the Dept. of Magical Law Enforcement was, in fact, aware.
Either there were too few of these cumulative incidents to have struck the
investigating Aurors as significant yet, or this particular information was
classified. I think that the fact that any of the DEs were "marked" would
have been highly classified information that Crouch Sr. as head of the Dept. of
Magical Law Enforcement ruthlessly suppressed. The real Moody may also have
known about it, but he also may have learned about that from Dumbledore, or
from Snape directly. The false Moody certainly knew it, and taunted Snape on
the matter. Even
without magical concealment, the Mark probably wasn't particularly visible when
not "active", but there may well be magical ways to cause it to
reveal itself - so long as Voldemort was alive and present on the physical
plane somewhere to "complete the circuit". After he was gone, there
was no longer a connection to be activated, visibly or in any other manner. How
much the significance of the Mark on those few captured DEs who were unable to
conceal in time was realized is uncertain. In any
case, Fudge, whose background was in the Department of Magical Catastrophes,
would not have been on the "need to know" list at all. And remains
clearly unaware of its existence even after serving the Ministry for years as
Minister of Magic. In fact it is quite possible that sealing those particular
records was another of Crouch Sr.'s big "mistakes" which he made in
an attempt to protect and reserve it as his own private resource. It is
possible that this was the sort of thing that he intended to keep to himself as
a tool toward managing to capture that "one last Dark wizard" which
had so occupied his ambitions. Concerning
Double-00 Severus and the Great Game; Which
brings us around to a note of ambiguity in Karkaroff's behavior, given
Dumbledore's testimony regarding Snape's activities at Karkaroff's hearing. Specifically
Dumbledore's statement was that Snape HAD BEEN a Death Eater, and that he had
turned spy. Given the fact that Dumbledore DID make that particular defense at
Karkaroff's hearing, WHY did Karkaroff go running to Snape once the Dark Mark
started returning, rather than to Dumbledore? Didn't the fool realize that it
was probably information from Snape that had resulted in his arrest in the
first place? I mean, really! One piece
of additional information that has only been given us in OotP, is that it has
now been confirmed that Voldemort did send Snape to Hogwarts, presumably to
infiltrate Dumbledore's school and to pass information on Dumbledore's actions
before he fell at Godric's Hollow. It is this factor which has enabled Snape to
allay suspicions and retain contact with the likes of Malfoy throughout the
entire period of Voldemort's absence. But, from the wording of Dumbledore's
testimony, I am inclined to believe that Snape had been keeping in touch with
Hogwarts on Voldemort's orders for some time before he took up his position as
the Hogwarts Potions Master, which was only finally accomplished some two
months before Voldemort's defeat. Voldemort
would have wanted to place as many agents as possible within Dumbledore's
sphere at his earliest convenience, and Snape, according to all indications so
far appears to have been one of his first choices of agent. I suspect that
Snape's skill as an Occlumens was probably the deciding factor for grooming him
to actually take up a position in the School. There was been strong suggestion
made in the course of Phoenix that Voldemort is not the only wizard to be a
master of Legilimency. Dumbledore seems to share this skill. There is strong
indication that with Snape's refusal to continue the Occlumency lessons, Dumbledore
may be taking on Harry's training in that field himself. By the
time Voldemort turned his followers loose from the meeting in the graveyard,
the news of Karkaroff's flight was public. The capture and Kissing of Barty
Crouch Jr. was probably hush-hush information, (shakes the public's confidence
in the security of Azkaban, don't you know... Particularly after the public
embarrassment over Sirius Black's escape two years earlier). Unless Fudge told
him of the event, it might have been a few days before Lucius was able to pick
up that little tidbit. By the time Draco got home from Hogwarts he probably
found himself facing an inquisition from his father over just what the hell
went on at school during his fourth year. And Draco would have brought home the
bacon regarding Hermione's capture of Rita Skeeter. Snape's
ongoing task in covering his tracks to Lucius is a whole different ball-game
from covering them to Voldemort, and covering them to the Slytherin students is
an even simpler matter. But, then, he probably didn't particularly need to
cover those tracks to Voldemort. By all indications, Snape was believed to be
spying on Dumbledore long before he was spying for Dumbledore. And even that is
subject to some question. During
the 3-year gap between the publication of Goblet and that of Phoenix, there was
a persistent belief in fandom that Snape would no longer be able to continue
spying for Dumbledore within Voldemort's organization. This belief seems to
have been based upon a strong conviction that Snape had been "outed" by
his action in saving Harry in the broom hexing incident back in PS/SS or by
Dumbledore's testimony at Karkaroff's hearing With the
publication of Phoenix, it is clear that Snape has not been outed and that he
continues to serve Dumbledore in the capacity of a spy. He retains Lucius
Malfoy's good opinion and there is no indication that Voldemort harbors
suspicions regarding him. How does one reconcile this apparent contradiction? Clearly
one must do so by forming an alternative interpretation of his actions as they
have been presented in the previous four books. Rowling has not suddenly
changed her mind as to what the Professor's part in this adventure entails. Consequently,
the information that is necessary to unravel the line of actions to date must
already be present in the work, despite Rowling's thick overlay of moonshine
and misdirection. Our most
basic piece of misdirection is that the books are tightly told from Harry's
point of view. It takes a considerable effort of will to keep reminding
ourselves that Harry and his friends are a good deal more in the dark as to
what is taking place in each book than Dumbledore is. We are also forced to
remember that if Dumbledore does indeed trust and depend upon Professor Snape,
then he must make a point of seeing to it that Snape has enough information to
be able to take the steps necessary to cover his arse. I have
long contended that Snape's actions throughout PS/SS viv-a-vis QuirrellMort was
very carefully orchestrated to deflect Voldemort's suspicion. Explaining his
actions in PS/SS are a piece of cake. ("How was I to know that was you
under Quirrell's turban? Quirrell wasn't ever one of your followers! Why didn't
you TELL me?"* or, "How was I to know it was Quirrell hexing the
broom? I thought it was one of my 6th or 7th years! Thwarting brats who are
flirting with a spell in Azkaban is part of my JOB, ****it!") Given that
Snape was not "supposed" to know that Voldemort was hiding under
Quirrell's turban, he could have hardly come forward singing Voldemort's
praises without looking extremely suspicious. At that point in the series,
Snape's need was not to convince Voldemort that he was on his side so much as
to convince him that he was not on Dumbledore's. And that he seems to have accomplished
very tidily with his tissue of clever ambiguities and his well-acted pose as
the wicked-ex-Death-Eater-on-no-one's-side-but-his-own. Evidently his behavior
was sufficiently consistent with Voldemort's expectations of his followers'
conduct whenever he was not around and not expected to be showing up to pass
muster. Any lingering suspicions were set to rest when Snape turned up promptly
and took his old place in the circle at the end of GoF. There is
also a very strong indication that Harry may have managed to overturn one of
the little set-piece skits which Snape and Dumbledore had planned for
QuirrellMort's entertainment and edification. Harry's capture of the snitch
brought the Hufflepuff match to a close in something under five minutes. Snape's
offer to referee that match coupled with Dumbledore's presence at it seems to
suggest that they had something planned for that particular event which may
have been designed to offset the impression which had been left after the broom-hexing
incident. Snape's behavior when the match was ended prematurely tends to
support this reading, and the demonstration was shelved, leaving him to have to
fall back on his meeting with Quirrell in the forest instead. *For that
matter, why DIDN'T Squirrelymort contact his followers and get them to help
him? What else are followers FOR? Or couldn't he contact them because
possessing Quirrell didn't really mean that he was alive again, the Dark Marks
were still missing in action, and Quirrell didn't have one anyway The
question has now been solidly answered as to whether Snape continues as a spy. The
second question raised is often how does he manage to spy. As to how is Snape
spying, I would guess that - on the Voldemort end - once Voldy managed to get
himself settled in someplace, Snape has been spying pretty much in the same way
that Voldemort sent him into Hogwarts to spy. And - on the Dumbledore end - he
has been picking up whatever information is being passed around the DE network.
Particularly any names that didn't get turned up the last time. Much of his
activity during the summer break seems to have been occupied by courier duty as
Voldemort's deputies started re-establishing their links to his secondary tier
of followers. As to
where we got the clues necessary to add up the time and realize that Snape
started as a teacher at Hogwarts before Voldemort fell; In the
course of Dolores Umbridge making a nuisance of herself with her clipboard
Snape admitted to having been teaching at Hogwarts for 14 years. Harry is just 15,
so Snape started teaching the year Harry turned 1 year old. This was the year
Voldemort fell. But school started Sept 1, and Voldemort didn't fall until Oct 31. As to
Dumbledore's testimony during Karkaroff's hearing in the Pensieve; this came
across sounding as if Snape had been spying for Dumbledore for a considerable
time before Voldemort actually fell, so it seems likely that there is at least
one double-bluff going on. We do not know yet how much is known at either end
of this particular pipeline or just how it was set up. But some of the
possibilities are; 1. A
minority theory popular among a certain sector of Snapefans is that Dumbledore
enlisted Snape while he was still at school. (In the aftermath of the werewolf
caper?) He sent him to infiltrate Voldemort's organization, and if possible to
get Voldy to send him back as a spy in Hogwarts. He made a point of teaching
the boy Occlumency in preparation for this mission. The poor penitent DE pose
is a double-bluff cover story later added from the Voldemort end. The most
likely suggestions, however, are; 2. Voldemort
sent Snape to spy on Dumbledore. Dumbledore won Snape over to his own side. Now
Snape is spying on Voldemort and feeding him selected bits of info that Albus
gives him for that purpose. 3. Same
original set up as in #2, but since Voldy fell the first time Snape has had
time to have second thoughts. He is passing info back and forth between both of
his principals and is keeping his own council. When the time comes will back
the side that offers him the best deal. 4. Voldemort
sent Snape to spy on Dumbledore under a cover act of being a poor penitent DE
who wants out. Snape is actually spying on Dumbledore and feeding him selected
bits of info that Voldemort gives him for the purpose. This last
might even be true. There was very little in Snape's actions in Order of the
Phoenix to contradict the possibility that he may be playing a double game of
which Dumbledore is not aware. For once Ron Weasley's suspicions could be right.
But I suspect that, as in the case of the Redheaded Pimpernel, we won't know
the truth of the matter for some time yet. One thing that probably should be
remembered at this point is that it was Snape who gave the message to Fudge
regarding the capture of Barty Crouch Jr. We do not know what else Snape might
have told him, either. For my
own part, I think that it is highly unlikely that Rowling is going to permit us
to settle back and relax with no further questions as to Snape's true loyalties
between now and the end of the series. I confidently suspected that before we
were halfway through Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Snape's
behavior, or further information regarding his backstory would have put him
firmly back in the cross-hairs of readers' suspicions. I was very surprised to
see that this did not happen. But we were still given a couple of hints that
this question is likely to be raised at some point in the future. In the
light of this, I will make one rock-solid guarantee that at some point before
the series ends, we are going to get some information regarding Snape's
actions, or his backstory that is going to throw his GoF outing of himself as "the
DE who recanted" into question. This information may later turn out to be
a red herring, but for at least some time it is going to be up to us to decide
what to do with it. In order
to carry any degree of verisimilitude, Snape's original mission would have
depended upon there having had some obvious reason for Snape to have remained
in contact with Dumbledore throughout the later years of Voldemort's rise. Snape
could hardly have become a teacher at the school during Voldemort's reign
without Voldemort's knowledge and consent, and it is a good deal more likely
that he would have done so at his direction. Since Snape only actually became a
teacher a matter of weeks before Voldemort's fall, in order to have been a spy,
for either side, for any length of time prior to that point, would mean that
there must have been some position in which Voldemort could have placed him
where he would be able to gather at least some degree of information without
actually being on the staff, until such a time as he might reasonably be hired.
From the Dumbledore end, it is unlikely that Snape would have earned the sort
of testimony that Albus made at Karkaroff's hearing in only the matter of weeks
that he had actually been teaching. Since Snape would have been no more than 21
or 22 at the time of Voldemort's defeat at Godric's Hollow, this would require
that there be some reason for him to remain in contact with Hogwarts after
finishing school, but before he was sufficiently qualified to be hired as a
teacher. One
suggestion; At the
time GoF was published, there was an interview comment by Rowling to the effect
that there are no wizarding universities in her interpretation of the wizarding
world. (Wizards are a rare breed, and the wizarding population of Europe is
probably not quite large enough to support one.) If this is the case, then any
form of advanced training would probably be a matter of either some form of
independent study or is accomplished within a formal Master/Apprentice program. The study
of Potions mastery, with its extensive physical component and its dependence
upon wandless control appears to be the sort of field which would require at
least some form of advanced training. In the absence of a university course on
the subject, it would stand to reason that the existing wizarding training
academies might have some sort of additional responsibility to oversee such
independent study programs. If this is the case, then Snape would have had a
built-in reason to have retained contact with Hogwarts Academy after finishing
his seventh year. At least for the 3-7 years that one might project for either
an Independent study "Masters" program or an Apprenticeship. Now that
Voldemort really IS back, and it is clear that Snape seems still to be solidly
entrenched in his role as a spy, it is evident that fandom's most common
reading of Voldemort's speech in the graveyard regarding the Coward and the
Oathbreaker and the Faithful Servant, is bound to have been somewhat off target. Since
Voldemort has at least provisionally accepted Snape's "wicked-ex-DE-on-nobody's-side-but-his-own"
act in PS/SS. It is also clear, after the fact, that although Harry obviously
missed it, Snape must have been present in the circle of Death Eaters at the
graveyard meeting and, was, consequently, an eyewitness to Harry's escape. According
to Sirius Black - whose information was good up to the day after Voldemort's
fall - Snape was never publicly suspected of DE activity despite having run
with a crowd of later-acknowledged DEs while at school. Nor, as in Pettigrew's
case, did any of the imprisoned DEs in Sirius's hearing make any mention of him.
In Snape, Voldemort has a follower who has not ever come under public suspicion,
and, consequently, one whose "secret" identity is to be preserved. Consequently,
the implication is that Snape is one of the DEs that Voldemort passed by
without speaking to. This situation may be blown sky high when Karkaroff is
captured. But indications are that the game may be deeper than that, and
Voldemort had sent Snape into Hogwarts. Consequently,
the implication is that Snape is one of the DEs that Voldemort passed by
without speaking to. This situation may be blown sky high when Karkaroff is captured.
But indications are that the game may be deeper than that, and Voldemort had
sent Snape into Hogwarts with orders to offer to 'spy' for Dumbledore. If this
is the case, then Dumbledore's testimony at Karkaroff's hearing (which was not
Karkaroff's trial. Karkaroff's trial had taken place nearly a year before the
hearing that we saw. Karkarof had been tried, sentenced and imprisoned. He
offered to cut a deal as soon as Voldemort himself was out of the way. Most of
his information was useless by then, although he did manage to finger Rookwood)
would have only confirmed what Voldemort already knew, and had intended. Now that
it has been established that Voldemort did originally send Snape to spy on
Dumbledore's organization, the Coward and the Oathbreaker that Voldemort spoke
of in the graveyard scene are most likely to have been Karkaroff and Bagman. It
would be very much in keeping with the way such things are handled in the
series for Voldemort, in pronouncing the ultimate fates of three specific Death
Eaters, to have these pronouncements balanced by our presence in Dumbledore'e
Pensieve at those three specific Death Eaters' trials. Very much in the way
that the fates of the surviving other members of Snape's Hogwarts "gang"
that Sirius mentioned should also all have been related and/or viewed before
the end of the book. It is now
clear enough to me that it is Karkaroff that Voldemort refers to when speaking
of the Oathbreaker. Karkaroff is a slimy specimen, but he does seem to truly
have repented of his DE associations. He has made his peace with the Ministry
and he clearly was NOT looking forward to a Dark rising. When he sold out he
stayed sold. Still, when his Mark began to return who did he go to? Not
Dumbledore (and why NOT Dumbledore?). He went to Snape, who he KNOWS was a spy.
Snape who he probably now thinks of as the ONLY other person who is in the same
boat he is in - that of a genuine ex Death Eater. And Snape rebuffed him. Had
he gone to Dumbledore, some provision for his safety may have been made. According
to Voldemort, the Coward will merely be forced to "pay" for his
cowardice. The Oathbreaker will be killed. Given that the DEs know that
Karkaroff sold them out in return for his own release, I cannot really see
Voldemort merely hitting him with a round of Crutius and keeping him on a short
leash. If the
Oathbreaker is Karkaroff, then the Coward is almost sure to be Bagman. Chiefly
because it seems less than probable that the identities of the three missing
DEs referred to in the graveyard speech are those of persons who had not yet
been introduced by the time the speech was made. (We have absolutely no
certainly on this point. Voldemort could have been referring to completely
unknown people at that point in time, but that would be generally regarded as "cheating"
on Rowling's part.) Bagman
dodged the bullet at his trial by making himself out to be a simple dupe. Augustus
Rookwood, his contact, was already under investigation. Consequently, Bagman
betrayed no one, cut no deals and attempted only to save himself. The other DEs
have no quarrel with him. In point of fact, he may indeed have been no more
than a simple dupe - but he has also been demonstrated to be one extremely
shifty character, and truthfulness is not his main stock in trade. Ludo
Bagman also did a bolt by the end of the TriWizard Tournament, under the very
useful - and quite plausible - cover of dodging Goblin enforcers over a little
matter of gambling debts. This may also be true. But it would not be difficult
to believe that his real gamble was over another kind of stakes altogether. He
managed to squirm out of a tight spot a dozen years ago, he may very well have
decided that he doesn't want to take any further personal risks and to just sit
this one out. In his case, I can see a bout of Crutius and being kept on a
short leash as lying within the likely parameters. The
identity of the Faithful Servant is no mystery. Despite strenuous attempts by
some fans to give this one a more "mysterious" spin, the Faithful
Servant was clearly Barty Crouch Jr., referred to as such all the way back in
Book 4's first chapter and finally revealed to the reader when he dragged Harry
off to his office after the return from the graveyard. Which all
means that during the period that Harry was an unwilling guest at the "feast"
Voldemort did not refer to Snape at all. By this
time, there can be very little plausible argument against the reading that
Snape was actually present at Voldemort's "re-birthday party". Again,
we have to remind ourselves that Dumbledore and Snape are not as much in the
dark as the kids are. And that Dumbledore gives Snape enough information to
enable him to try to protect himself. And that neither of them is stupid. I think
that once Snape calmed down at the end of PoA, Dumbledore filled him in on it
having been Pettigrew who was Voldemort's spy at the time of Voldemort's fall,
and that Pettigrew had faked his death, been flushed out of hiding, had managed
to escape and was, presumably, on his way to rejoin Voldemort. Snape,
consequently, was alert to any indications that his Dark mark was returning,
and reported as much to Dumbledore as soon as he was sure. He reported this
again when Karkaroff confirmed his own observations. When
Harry's name came out of the Goblet, back in October, they both immediately
knew that Voldemort had managed to recruit yet another agent who was operating
under cover at the school. At this point, it was obvious to both Dumbledore and
Snape that Voldemort had another plot underway, and the two of were waiting for
him to make his move all year. They both know something of how Voldemort's mind
works, and that the "move" had not been made by the night of the
Third task made it a pretty safe bet that the move would come that night. Consequently,
Snape was not one of the people who was patrolling the bounds of the maze. Dumbledore
kept Snape by him, ready to react when Voldemort finally made his long-anticipated
"move". If the
DMLE and the Real Moody did not have reason to already know of the Dark Mark's
existence, the false Moody's taunt may well have been a clue that Snape and
Dumbledore had not overlooked. But Dumbledore seems to have a weakness for
capturing his opponents in the act. Rather than cornering him, confiscating his
hip flask and waiting for the Polyjuice to wear off, the two of them may have
been watching "Moody" from the time that it was made. But there is
little expectation that Harry would have been aware of that. It is somewhat,
more likely that the real Moody did know about the Dark mark, and the taunt was
not reported to Dumbledore. When
Harry and Cedric disappeared from the maze, Snape and Dumbledore knew that this
was it. Snape retrieved his mask and robe and got to the edge of the Hogwarts
bounds to wait for the call to come. If it did not, then they would have a
reprieve, but the likelihood of that was vanishingly small. It took
at least a half hour to 40 minutes for Pettigrew to have killed Cedric, set up
the cauldron and performed the rebirthing ritual. There was ample time for
Severus to ready himself for the call. When it came, he silently took his place
in the circle with his fellows, probably cursing the certainty that he was now
going to have to blow his cover with a rescue attempt to get Potter out of
there. Which was
not required. Snape was
there. He saw Potter escape death at Voldemort's hand. He saw Potter overcome
the Dark Lord's force of will in the battle between the wands and he saw Potter
make his escape, taking Cedric's body with him. That odd look he was giving
Harry over breakfast at the end of term is probably because he has finally seen
Harry in action and is having to re-evaluate his impressions of the boy. This
cautious re-evaluation seems to have carried over into the first half of OotP
as well. Although there are other elements involved in this as well. Once
Harry made his escape, I suspect that Voldemort gave Snape the nod to follow
and report back. I believe that Snape made his return with the aid of an
unauthorized portkey (with which he had originally been intending to rescue
Potter) which would have taken him to an unobserved point within Hogwarts where
he could ditch the robe and mask and find Dumbledore to fill him in. We did
not actually see Snape until he, Minerva and Albus showed up in Moody's office
to rescue Harry. It must have taken Moody at least 20-30 minutes to assist
moving an injured boy all the way from the Quidditch pitch into the castle, up
to his office and only then to have started his brag fest, filling Harry in on
just what had been going down for the past school year, and his own part in it.
Yes, the time was still tight, but it was sufficient for Snape to have
returned, ditched the DE rig, flagged down Dumbledore and filled him in on the
way to Moody's office. Part of Rowling's insistence upon pointing out to us the
image of Snape staring at his own face in the foe glass may have been in
recognition of the irony of his having just come from the DE's circle, on
Voldemort's orders. In that
case it is easy enough to guess what the task was that Dumbledore had to ask
whether Snape was prepared for during the scene in the Hospital Wing. Snape's
task was to return to Voldemort and to report back on the events following
Harry's return to Hogwarts. Given
that portkeys do work on Hogwarts grounds, Snape's return trip was probably
accomplished by this method for the sake of speed. It would hardly be
surprising for a teacher to have access to an unauthorized private portkey for
the purpose of getting to and from the school in emergencies. Particularly
given Dumbledore's willingness to create an unauthorized one when such is
required. (Dumbledore's trip to and from the Ministry in PS/SS was probably
also undertaken by means of a portkey.) It has
also occurred to me (and probably a lot of other people who are engaged in
phrasing it differently) that there could be another rather interesting double-bluff
going on regarding Snape's vicious behavior vis-a-vis the Hogwarts students. It is not
ALL an act, but, nevertheless, he IS acting. And it DOES serve a specific
purpose. I also believe that he has Dumbledore's tacit go-ahead for it,
although Dumbledore may not altogether approve of his methods. What
Snape is doing is to very deliberately, very conspicuously NOT distance himself
from the past. In fact, he is rubbing the kids' noses in it. Given his basic
temperament, and in his position as head of Slytherin House, the chances of his
actually managing to live his House's somewhat mottled past down are
vanishingly small to begin with. Despite the fact that he personally was never
publicly accused, even if he behaved the perfect gent (which, with his
disposition, would be a strain - he is not a nice man), he lived through the
Voldemort years, he is the head of Slytherin's House, and he is "a deeply
horrible person". There would be rumors flying about of an ex-DE
background regardless of what he did. And it would take next to no effort to
confirm those rumors for anyone who decided to really investigate. Karkaroff's
hearing was not an open one, but I doubt the records were so tightly sealed
that no one could get into them. There were too many witnesses. To the
wizarding world, Severus Snape, a Slytherin of the most suspect generation is
always going to be a reputed ex-Death Eater to somebody's point of view. It also
stands to reason that Albus took him on staff with the understanding that he
would do something to discourage other young people from making the same kind
of mistakes that he did. Snape's a
pragmatic Slytherin, not a social justice-seeking Gryffindor. And even if he is
every bit as much a supporter of Dumbledore's goals as Dumbledore believes, he
probably figures that the Slytherin kids with DE connections are already a lost
cause. It isn't their own choices which are going to get exercised. Playing the
wise and kindly councilor to dissuade them from taking that particular step
isn't going to do anything but send a message back to their parents which will
get him targeted for elimination. He might be able to dissuade the ones who
might be allowed to refuse with some pointed comments that Voldemort doesn't
want half-hearted followers. But that's about as far as he can get with the
Slyths. But, by
ghod, he can make an impression on the students of the OTHER three houses. And
the Slyths can unwittingly give him a hand by helping spread and support the
rumors. He intends to send all of the brats a clear, unambiguous message.
("Play to your strengths".) If they
want to see a Death Eater, he will SHOW them a Death Eater. And see
how well they like it. Every day
of the week for seven years those kids are getting an up close and personal
demonstration of just what a Death Eater is, with ALL the pettiness, spite,
partiality, injustice, treachery, contempt and cruelty on full display. You think
you want to be a Death Eater someday? You want to have to work with people like
me? You want to have to ASSOCIATE with people like me? DEPEND on people like
me? (If this is the tame virus what must the actual disease be like?) Snape
doesn't want the brats to like him. He wants them to LOATHE him. And more to the
point, he wants them to REMEMBER him. And, by ghod, he is going to put on a
show they can't forget. And,
maybe, just maybe, when some smooth-tongued Voldemort supporter comes around
trying to recruit some promising young Gryff or 'Puff or 'Claw, maybe the
impression will have been indelible enough to give them pause before being
swept off their feet. And maybe they will think to pass the word about someone
to watch out for. And, who knows, maybe by counter-example he can even reach a
few of his Slyths. Besides,
it won't hurt the brats to learn to perform delicate work under pressure. They're
going to meet other *******s out in the real world, too. Guaranteed. So, with
all these justifications in mind, he has effectively given himself a free
ticket to play the ******* and act out his every natural frustration to the top
of his bent. Right in their faces. He may even realize that he really is a
bully - however well he may dress it up in fine linen (and I think he probably
does dress it up in fine linen. He isn't all THAT self-aware). If he weren't a
bully he probably wouldn't have been so quick to sign up with Voldemort in the
first place. Make no
mistake. Severus Snape ENJOYS terrorizing adolescents. He LIKES tormenting
young Longbottom. He looks forward to the opportunity to needle Potter - whom
he honestly resents, and who can stand to be taken down a peg, in his opinion -
and he was positively hugging himself with glee on the red-letter day that he
actually managed to make Granger cry. In short,
Snape really does like his job. He is
having a ball. (The rest of the staff, who know what is going on, are
scandalously amused by his antics, and Dumbledore trusts him.) And
Rowling is clearly having a ball writing him. And so are we in reading about
him. And when somebody does such a good job of entertaining you, you just can't
help but like them. But then my other favorite "literary Harry" is Sir Harry Padget Flashman..
|